RankWise delivers honest, technical SEO services — no inflated promises, no black-hat shortcuts. Clear, well-explained work from a real SEO consultant, at a fair price.
Most SEO pitches lean on fear — "you're losing customers every day you wait." RankWise takes a different approach: showing what's actually happening on your site — what Google can see, what it can't, and what's realistically fixable next.
Every recommendation comes with plain-language reasoning and the data behind it — a rare thing among agencies chasing hiring an SEO expert without ever explaining their methods. This site itself is the proof: every technical decision here is documented, not hidden behind jargon.
SEO audits, on-page optimization, technical fixes, and content strategy — see the full breakdown, pricing, and answers to common questions.
Every technical fix, every page rewritten, every internal link added serves one outcome: appearing higher for searches that actually matter to your business.
I'd rather show you three true things than a wall of fake five-star reviews.
Rather than describe the work, here is the actual before-and-after from crawling rankwises.com — including the problems that were found and the ones that were mine to begin with.
Most of those were errors I introduced and then caught — written up honestly in technical SEO examples, alongside the full two-week numbers. A provider who has never broken anything has probably never audited anything.
Technical SEO is a sequence, not a checklist. A failure at any stage makes the next one irrelevant — which is why SEO audits work top-down.
No account manager relaying requests to someone else. No junior staff learning on your project. Every recommendation, every fix, every report comes directly from the person actually doing the technical SEO work.
Most sites arrive with a symptom rather than a diagnosis. These are the ones that come up most, and what's normally underneath them.
You search your own content and nothing comes up, even weeks after publishing.
UsuallyThe new site looks better and performs worse. Rankings slid within weeks of launch.
UsuallyYou get impressions, but for searches from people who were never going to buy.
UsuallyIt feels fine on your laptop. On mobile data it takes seconds to become usable.
UsuallySomeone worked on the site. You don't know what they changed, or whether it helped.
UsuallyChatGPT and Perplexity never mention you, even for questions your site answers well.
UsuallyRecognise more than one? That's normal — these tend to share root causes. A free audit will tell you which apply to your site specifically.
Rather than claims about expertise, here are pages where the working is shown — including the numbers that aren't flattering.
The real Search Console data from this site's first two weeks, with the position that explains it and the four things I broke along the way.
READ THE NUMBERS → DIRECTORYWhich popular tools are genuinely free, which need an account, and which are a trial wearing a free label. Competitors included, including ones better than mine.
SEE THE LIST → MISTAKESReal before-and-after examples, most of which were errors I introduced on this site and had to find and correct.
SEE WHAT BROKE →Not a pie chart of promises — a realistic split of where hours go on a typical engagement, which is mostly unglamorous work rather than strategy decks.
I'm early in my career and building my track record — which means right now you get more direct attention and lower rates than I'll likely offer once I have a full roster of case studies. No fake reviews here, just an honest trade: early access for early pricing.
How was this site to use?
Three quick ratings on the site itself — not a testimonial, just honest feedback that helps me improve it.
Goes straight to me — no email required, nothing published without asking you first.
Thanks — that's genuinely useful.
Feedback like this is how the site gets better.
Pre-written answers, not a live AI. For anything specific, email me.